Anti-Petroff Repertoire with d4

By Michael Goeller
Today I offer up an interesting "Anti-Petroff Repertoire with d4" focused on lines where White gets an attacking set-up with a pawn at e5. While it has been played at the highest levels, this is still a relatively unusual line and one that players as Black will not often see, since the 3.Nxe4 d6 4.Nf3 Nxe5 exchange is so standard at every level. In fact, a number of books on the Petroff give scarcely a chapter on 3.d4, and those that do discuss 3.d4 focus on the more traditional lines where White takes at e5 with the Knight (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.d4 Nxe4 4.Bd3 d5 5.Nxe5). The positions where White takes at e5 with a pawn, however, are less symmetrical and more frequently give White kingside attacking chances.
I first became interested in this line after seeing some nice White wins after 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.d4 Nxe4 4.Bd3 d5 5.dxe5 Be7 6.O-O Nc6 7.Nc3! which is featured in the first games below. I like this move a lot. White allows doubled pawns in exchange for getting rid of the centralized Knight, speeding development, and gaining open lines (note the half-open b-file) and added control of the center (especially the d4-square). It is an interesting trade-off and one that has proven somewhat favorable for White in practice, including in our featured game Kosteniuk - Pourkashiyan from the ongoing Women's World Championship tournament (where GM Kosteniuk is playing in the final).
I call this a "repertoire" because I do not offer complete coverage of 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.d4, focusing only on my recommendations where White tends to get a pawn at e5. The only place where I have erred on the side of inclusiveness is against Murey's surprising 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.d4 Nxe4 4.Bd3 Nc6!? where White has a number of interesting options, though I do tend to prefer 5.Bxe4 d5 6.Bg5! Against the less common 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.d4 exd4, White always has, of course, the option of transposing to my favorite Urusov Gambit (with 4.Bc4), but I also offer the interesting line 4.e5 Ne4 5.Qe2!? which sidesteps the extensive theory of 5.Qxd4 and tends to produce interesting attacking possibilities based on the pawn at e5. As always, I welcome reader input and improvements.
Alexandra Kosteniuk (2510) - Atousa Pourkashiyan (2269) [C43]
WCh-Women/Nalchik RUS (1.1) 2008
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. d4 Nxe4 4. Bd3 d5 5. dxe5 Be7 6.
Alternatives up to this point are considered below. Here, 6... Bg4 allows White to take a slight edge into the endgame after 7. Bxe4! (a good alternative is 7. Nc3!? Nxc3 8. bxc3 Nc6 which probably transposes to the game line)
7... dxe4 8. Qxd8+ Bxd8 9. Nd4
(White wins a pawn and is eventually able to convert it to a point.) 19... e3 20. Nxe3 c5 21. Kf1 Rd4 22. c3 Bd3+ 23. Kg1 Rd6 24. Rd2!? b5 25. Nc2 Red8 26. Red1 Ke7 27. Ne1 Be4 28. Rxd6 Rxd6 29. Rxd6 Kxd6 30. Kf1 Kd5 31. Ke2 Bb1 32. a3 Kc4 33. Kd2 Be4 34. f3 Bg6 35. b4 Kb3 36. bxc5 Kxa3 37. c6 Ka4 38. g4 Be8 39. c7 Bd7 40. Nd3 Ka5 41. Nc5 Bc8 42. Ne4 Kb6 43. Nxf6 Kxc7 44. Nxh7 Kd6 45. h4 a5 46. h5 Ke7 47. Ng5 Bb7 48. h6 Kf6 49. f4 1-0 Shirov,A-Adams,M/Elista 2007.
7. Nc3
|
This is the current fashion: White allows doubled pawns in exchange for getting rid of the centralized Knight, speeding development, and gaining added control of the center (especially the d4-square). It is an interesting trade-off and one that has proven somewhat favorable for White in practice, since now the power of the e5 pawn is not balanced by Black's centralized Knight.
Of course, here the exchange does not work: 7. Bxe4? dxe4 8. Qxd8+ Bxd8
.
7... Nxc3
7... Bf5 8. Qe1!? (White would like to play Qd2-f4, but that route is not available at the moment) 8... Bb4 9. Qe3 Bxc3 10. bxc3 Bg6 11. Ba3 Qd7 12. Nd4
8. bxc3 Bg4 9. Re1 Qd7 10. h3 Be6
10... Bxh3? 11. gxh3 Qxh3 12. Bf1 gives Black less than nothing.
11. Rb1!
Another point of the doubled pawns: the half-open b-file gives White more mobility and discourages Black from queenside castling.
11... Rb8
12... h6?! 13. Nxe6 Qxe6 14. Qh5! induces more weaknesses on the kingside, leaving Black's monarch no safe home.
13. Bxg5
(The rook faces the Black Queen to add extra force to the inevitable c4 break).
15... Ne7
15... b5 16. c4! bxc4 17. Bxc4 d4 18. Bd3!
17. cxd5
White can already win a pawn by 17. Bxe7 Rxe7 18. cxd5 Bxd5 19. Qxd5 Qxd5 20. Bxh7+ Kxh7 21. Rxd5 but a double-Rook ending would be difficult, so Kosteniuk rightly waits to cash in her positional chips.
The dark squares around Black's King look inviting.
18... Ng6 19. h4 h5 20. f4! Qc5+ 21. Kh2 Bxa2
|
22... Qf8 23. Bxg6 fxg6 24. Rd7! Bf7 25. e6!
23... fxg6 24. Qxg6+ Kf8 25. Qh6+! Kf7 26. Rd7+ Ke6 27. Qh7
|
Not the best defense, but Black is also busted after 24... Re7 25. Rxe5! Rxe5 26. fxe5
25. Qg5! Qf8 26. Qxh5+ Kg7 27. Qh7+ Kf6 28. fxe5+ Rxe5 29. Rf1+ Ke6 30. Rfxf7
Black resigns. The concluding attack is quite lovely and worthy of inclusion in "Art of Attack in Chess" by Vukovic. White's pawn at e5 naturally creates good attacking chances -- you just have to develop your pieces and point them at the enemy king!
30. Bf5+ Kf6 31. Bg4+ is only a little more precise.
1-0Z. Almasi (2672) - R. Ruck (2523) [C43]
15th TCh-CRO/Sibenik CRO (7) 2006
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. d4 Nxe4
a) 3... exd4 4. e5 (4. Bc4 is the Urusov Gambit)
4... Ne4 5. Qe2!? (standard is 5. Qxd4 d5 6. exd6 Nxd6 7. Nc3 Nc6 8. Qf4
)
5... Nc5 (5... Bb4+ 6. Nbd2)
6. Nxd4 Nc6 7. Be3 Nxd4 8. Bxd4
with chances for a White advantage -- see game below.
b) 3... d6 4. Nc3! Philidor's Defense
c) 3... d5!? 4. exd5! (4. Bg5!?) is complicated and deserves separate treatment. I recommend consulting a reference here and looking at a lot of games before making up your mind. I am still undecided.
This seems most frequently played, but Black has lots of alternatives:
a) 5... Be7 6.
Horvath - Forintos, Budapest 1985) 7... Nc6 (7... Be6 8. cxd5 (8. Nd4!? Horton)
(8. Qc2 Na6 9. a3 Nac5)
8... Bxd5 9. Qc2 f5 10. Nd4
)
(7... c6 8. Qc2
Zagorovsky - Shamayev, Leningrad 1949)
(7... Bg4 8. cxd5! (8. Bf4!? 1-0 Eastman,G-Gale,S/Hamilton 1924 (29))
(8. Qc2
)
8... Qxd5 9. Qc2 Bxf3 10. gxf3 Nc5 11. Bxh7+ Kh8 12. Qf5!
) 8. Qe2 (8. Nc3 Nxc3 9. bxc3 dxc4 10. Bxc4 Bg4) 8... Nc5 9. cxd5 Qxd5 10. Bc4
b) 5... Nc5 6.
)
10... f6 11. Nxe7+ Qxe7 12. exf6 Qxf6 13. Be3 Bf5 14. Qd2 Qg6 15. Rac1 Nd7 16. f3 Rae8
1-0 Vajda,S-Ionescu,I/Predeal ROM 2006 (59))
7. Nc3 ( White might also preserve the Bishop at a cost of time with 7. Be2
)
8. Be3 Bg4 9. h3 Bxf3 10. Bxf3 c6 11. c4! (11. Bg4 Nbd7 12. f4 f5!=)
11... dxc4 12. Nd2 b5?! (12... Nd3!
)
13. a4! Nxa4 14. Nxc4 Qc7 15. Nd6 Nd7 16. Nxb5!? cxb5 17. Rc1 Ndc5 18. Bxa8 Nxb2?! (18... Rxa8 19. b4 Qxe5)
19. Qd5! Nc4 20. Bxc5 Bxc5 21. Bc6
Ba3 22. Rc2 (22. Bxb5 Bxc1 23. Rxc1 Nb6 24. Rxc7 Nxd5 25. Rxa7
might be hard to win.)
22... a6 23. e6 Kh8 24. exf7 Rxf7? 25. Bxb5 axb5 26. Qxb5 Rf4 27. g3 Nd6 28. Rxc7 Nxb5 29. Rb7 Nd4 30. gxf4 h6 31. Kg2 Kh7 32. Rd1 Bc5 33. Rd7 Ne6 34. Kf3 Kg6 35. R7d5 Kf6 36. Rc1 Be7 37. Ke4 Kf7 38. Rc6 Nf8 39. Rf5+ Bf6 40. Rfxf6+ gxf6 41. Kf5 1-0 Romanishin,O-Arkhipov,S/Tbilisi 1986 (41))
(7. Nd4?! Nxd3 8. Qxd3 c5 9. Nf5 Bxf5 10. Qxf5 Qd7 11. Qf3 Nc6= Schlick - Autenreith, Germany 1985)
7... c6 (7... Be6 8. Be3 c6 9. Nd4
Bd7 20. a4
c) 5... Bf5 6. Qe2 (6. Nd4 Bg6)
6... Nc6 7. Nbd2 Nxd2 8. Bxd2 Qd7 9. 
6.
6. Bf4 Bg4 7. Nbd2 Nc5 (7... Nxd2 8. Qxd2 Bxf3 9. gxf3 Nd4?! 10.
6... Be7
b) 6... Bg4 7. Nc3 Nxc3 (7... Bxf3!? 8. Qxf3 Nxc3 9. bxc3 Nxe5 10. Re1
)
8. bxc3 Be7 9. Re1 1-0 Romanishin,O-Ehlvest,J/Yerevan 1988 (20) see below.
7. Nc3!
You can see this move as exchanging Black's best piece. And after the exchange, White gains open lines on the d- and b-files, while Black has few lines open for active play (unless he succeeds in getting in the f6 break.) So one point of 7. Nc3 could be just to improve White's pieces. Also playable, but not as good, is 7. Nbd2!? Nc5 8. Bb5 Bd7 9. Bxc6 Bxc6 10. Nd4
which is discussed in more detail below.
7... Nxc3
a) 7... Bf5 8. Qe1 Nb4 (8... Bb4 9. Qe3 Bxc3 10. bxc3
)
9. Nd4! (9. Nxe4 dxe4 10. Bxe4 Nxc2 11. Bxc2 Bxc2=)
9... Bg6 10. f4 c5 11. f5! Nxd3 12. cxd3 cxd4 13. fxg6 (13. Nxe4!? dxe4 14. Qxe4 Bh5? 15. f6!
)
13... hxg6 14. Nxe4 dxe4 15. Qxe4
Qb6 16. b3 (16. Bf4)
16...
)
18... Bg5! 19. Rc4 Be3+ 20. Kh1 Rfe8= 0-1 Nevednichy-Piket/New Dehli (29)
b) 7... Nc5 8. Bb5 a6 (8... Bd7?! 9. Nxd5
)
9. Bxc6+ bxc6 10. Nd4 Bd7 11. f4
This basic position could arise from the Two Knights Defense, Modern Variation and is quite favorable for White. 11... f5 12. b4 Ne6 13. Nxf5 Bxb4 14. Ne2 g6 15. Nfg3 Bc5+ 16. Kh1
8... Bg4 9. Re1 (9. Bf4
9... Na5?! Restraining the doubled pawns, but much too slow. 10. Nd4 c5 11. Nf5 Bxf5 (11... c4 12. Nxe7+ Qxe7 13. Bf1
)
12. Bxf5 Kh8 13. Qd3 Bh4 14. Bf4 Nc6 15. Rad1 f6 16. e6 Ne7 17. Qh3 g6 18. Be4 Bg5 19. Bxg5 fxg5 20. Bxd5 Nxd5 21. e7 Nxe7 22. Rxd8 Raxd8 23. Qe3 Nc6 24. Qxg5 Rf5 25. Qc1 Rfd5 26. h3 Kg8 27. Kh2 Kg7 28. Qa3 Rf5 29. Re2 h6 30. Qb3 Rf7 31. Qc4 b6 32. Re6 Ne7 33. Qe4 Rd7 34. f3 Kh7 35. a4 Nf5 36. Qe2 Ng7 37. Re5 Nf5 38. Re8 Ng7 39. Ra8 Rfe7 40. Qc4 Ne6 41. h4 h5 42. Rc8 Rd6 43. Qe4 Rdd7 44. Qc6 Nd8 45. Qf6 Rf7 46. Qe5 Rfe7 47. Qb8 1-0 Anand Viswanathan (IND)-REBEL/AEGON Simul, The Hague NED 1997 (47).
10... Bh5 11. Rb1 Rb8 (11... b6 12. Bf4
(12. Bf5!?)
)
12. Rb5! Kh8 (12... a6? 13. Rxd5!)
13. Be2 d4 14. Nxd4 Bxe2 15. Rxe2 a6 16. Rd2! Nxd4 17. Rxd4 axb5 (17... Qe8 18. Rbd5!
)
18. Rxd8 Rbxd8 19. Qf3 c6 Black's two Rooks compensate for the Queen, but White's kingside pawn majority is too much of a long-term advantage. 20. Be3 Rd5 21. Bd4 Kg8 22. Qe4 Rfd8 23. f4! c5 24. Bf2 f6 25. Qf5 fxe5 26. Qe6+ Kf8 27. fxe5 Rd1+ 28. Kh2 Rf1 29. Kg3 Bh4+?! 30. Kxh4 Rxf2 31. Qb6
Rdd2 32. Qxc5+ Kf7 33. g4 h6 34. Qc7+ Ke6 35. Qxg7 Rxc2 36. Qxh6+ Kxe5 37. Qb6 Rb2 38. Kg5 Rf7 39. Kg6 Rd7 40. Qf6+ 1-0 Duras,O-Cohn,E/Ostend 1907 (40).
|
12. Qd2!?
An interesting and thematic way of bringing the Queen to the kingside. Stronger, however, may be 12. Nd4! Qd7 (12... Nxd4?! 13. cxd4 c5 (13... Qd7 14. Qf3 b6 15. Qg3 Bf5 16. Rb3 Rbc8 17. Bg5 Rfe8 18. Bxe7 Rxe7 1/2-1/2 Romanishin,O-Akopian,V/Barcelona 1992 (18))
14. c3 c4 15. Bc2 Qa5 16. f4 Qxc3? 17. f5)
13. Qh5 g6 14. Qh6 Rfe8 (14... Rfd8 15. Bg5)
15. Nxc6 bxc6 16. Bg5
13... f6!? 14. c4! fxe5 15. Nxe5 Qd6 (15... Rxf4 16. Nxd7
)
16. Qg3
14. Ng5 Bxg5 15. Qxg5 Rf7 16. Be3 b6 17. Bb5 Ra8 18. Qg3!?
Already White has the plan to target the dark squares on the kingside. An interesting alternative was to threaten the light squares on the queenside: 18. Qf4! Qe8 (18... a6? 19. Qa4!
)
19. Qa4 Bd7
20. e6! Qxe6
21. Bf4 Qf6 22. c4! d4 (22... dxc4? 23. Rbd1!
)
23. c5!
Kh8 24. Bxc7 bxc5 25. Qc4
and after Qxc5 White will have a clear positional edge and the two bishops.
The threat of ...f4 forces White's next, but the Rook is misplaced here, as Black quickly recognizes.
19... Na5! 20. Bh5 Rff8! 21. Bg5 Nc4
places the doubled pawns under restraint and should give Black sufficient counterplay.
|
Black must weaken the dark squares or face an attack in the center and the kingside.
22... Rff8 23. c4! d4 (23... Qc6 24. Bh6
)
24. c3 Bxc4 25. Rxd4 Qe6 26. Rbd1 Bxa2 27. Rd7 Bb3 28. R1d4
Passive defense is insufficient, so Black decides to counter on the queenside.
24... Qxa2 25. h5 Qxc2 26. Rdc1! Qa4 27. c4 Qd7 28. hxg6 hxg6 29. Bg5
25. Bg5 f4! 26. Qh2! Qxa2 27. Bf6+ Kg8 28. Qxf4 Qxc2 29. c4 Raf8?!
Twice Black has made an error by putting the Rook on this square!
29... Re8! 30. Rbc1 Qa4 31. h5 dxc4 32. Qg5 is more complicated, though White's attack looks strong.
Black's King has no escape, and White gains an important tempo by attacking the Knight at e7 -- which would be defended if Black had played ... Re8 instead.
31... Qd7 32. cxd5 Nxd5 33. h5 Rg7
33... Nxf6 34. Rxd7 Nxd7 35. Rxc7 is also hopeless.
34. Bxd5 Bxd5 35. Bxg7 Kxg7 36. e6!
Black resigns, since 36...Qxe6 allows 37.Rxc7+ with a deadly attack.
36. Rxd5! Qxd5 37. Rxc7+ Rf7 38. Qf6+ was also winnng.
1-0A. Marchenko - V. Makarevich [C43]
Alushta UKR 2005
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. d4 Nxe4 4. Bd3 d5 5. dxe5 Nc6 6.
White has also successfully experimented with a number of different set-ups here: a) 6. Qe2!? Nc5 (6... Bg4! 7. Bxe4 dxe4 8. Qxe4 Bxf3 9. Qxf3 Qd4=)
7.
b) 6. h3 Bf5 7.
)
9. Bf4 Nxc3 10. bxc3 Qd7 11. Rb1 Bb6 12. Re1 Nd8 13. Bg5 Bxd3 14. Qxd3 Ne6 15. Rb4 Nc5 16. Qd2 Qf5 (16... Qe6)
17. Rf4 Qg6 18. Be7 Ne4 19. Rexe4 dxe4 20. Rg4 Rfe8?! (20... e3!)
21. Rxg6 hxg6 22. Qd7 exf3 23. gxf3
c5 24. f4 c4 25. h4 Rec8 26. Bd6 Re8 27. Be7 Rec8 28. Bd6 Re8 29. h5 gxh5 30. f5 Rac8 31. e6 f6 32. Qxb7 Red8 33. e7 Re8 34. Qd5+ Kh8 35. Qf7 Ba5 36. Kg2 Bxc3 37. Kh3 Be1 38. Kh4 Bd2 39. Kxh5 Kh7 40. f3 Bc1 41. f4 Bb2 42. Be5 1-0 Oral,T-Velicka,P/CZE 1999 (42)
c) 6. Nbd2 Bf5 (6... Nc5 7. Bb5
)
7. Nb3 Bg4 8.
)
40. Ke2 c5 41. Nf3 Kg7 42. Re8 Nc6 43. Re6 Nd8 44. Rd6 Nf7 45. Rxd5 Kf6 46. Kd3 Ke6 47. c4 Rg8 48. g4 Rg6 49. Rf5 a4 50. Rxf7! 1-0 Oll,L-Drazic,S/Nova Gorica SLO 1999 (50)
d) 6. Bf4 A logical deve loping move. White now sets up his pieces and pawns in order to control the dark squares, developing naturally by c3, Qc2, Nbd2, and only later deciding where to put his King. 6... Be7 ( The attempt to break up White's bind puts Black in too much danger: 6... f6 7.
)
7... Bg4 (7... g5 8. Nxg5 fxg5 9. Qh5+ Ke7 10. Bxe4 gxf4 11. Rd1
)
8. h3 fxe5 9. hxg4 exf4 10. c4)
7. c3!? (7.
)
7...
)
12. Nd2 Nd3+ 13. Ke2 Bf5 14. g4
)
8. Qc2 (8. Qe2?! Nc5 9. Bc2 d4!)
8... f5! 9. exf6 Nxf6 10. Nbd2 Bd6 11. Be3 Kh8 12.
This is the chief alternative to 7.Nc3. White's plan is to exchange the Black Knight at e4 without damaging his own pawn structrure.
7. c4!? Bg4 8. Bf4
)
10. Nc3! Nb4?! (10... Nxc3 11. bxc3 Bxd3 12. Qxd3 dxc4 13. Qxc4
)
11. Bb1! c6 12. a3 Qa5?? 13. Bxe4 dxe4 14. axb4 Qxb4 15. Nd2
1-0 Eastman,G-Gale,S/Hamilton 1924 (29)
7... Nxd2
|
7... Nc5 8. Bb5 (8. Nb3 Nxd3 9. Qxd3)
8... Bd7 9. Bxc6! (9. Nb3 Nxe5 10. Bxd7+ Ncxd7 11. Qxd5 c6 12. Qe4 Nxf3+ 13. Qxf3
)
(9. Re1 Nxe5!?)
9... Bxc6 10. Nd4
10. Qg3!
and by a very interesting route the Queen has arrived at an ideal place to help pressure the dark squares on the kingside.
10... g6?!
10... Qd7! 11. Qxg7?! (11. Bb5!)
11... 
11. Bh6 Qd7 12. a3
Black's kingside play is completely stymied while White is free to develop an attack on the queenside. Now Black slips up under pressure.
19. Rad1 Nb8? 20. Bxd7+ Qxd7 21. Bxg7 Rxg7 22. c4! c6 23. cxd5 cxd5 24. Rc1+
and Black mus t surrender material, as 24...Kd8 loses to 25.e6! 1-0 Marchenko,A-Makarevich, V/Alushta UKR 2005 (24)
1-0Sergei Rublevsky (2671) - Viorel Iordachescu (2627) [C43]
FIDE-Wch k.o./Tripoli (2.4) 2004
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. d4 Nxe4 4. Bd3 Nc6!?
|
Murey's surprising rejoinder can still astonish if you are not prepared to see it. White has a wide choice of response, including our thematic 5.dxe5 (considered in the present game); 5.Bxe4 d5 6. Bg5; 5.Nxe5; and 5.d5!? It's best to choose one and study it closely. I am personally uncommitted on which is best. The move 4... c6!? is also playable, but leads to more passive positions for Black since it deprives his Knight of its best square and does not develop a piece. 5.
)
5... d5 6. Nxe5 Nd7 7. Nxd7! Bxd7 8. Re1 Be7 (8... Be6!? 9. Qf3 (9. Bxe4 dxe4 10. Rxe4 Qf6 11. Qh5
)
9... Nf6 10. Bf5
)
9. Bxe4 dxe4 10. Rxe4
5... d5 6.
6. Nc3 Nxd3+ 7. Qxd3 d6 8. Bf4! dxe5
8... Nxe5 9. Nxe5 dxe5 10. Qxd8+ Kxd8 11. 
9... Bb4 10. 
|
10... Bf5 11. Bxc7 Rc8 12. Bg3 Nb4 (12... Bb4 13. Nxb4 Nxb4 14.
)
13. Kd2 Nxd3 14. cxd3 Bc5
11. Nb5!
11... a6
11... Bxf4 12. Nxf4 Kd8 13.
)
16. Nd5
12. Nxd6+
Black has very little to show for the pawn.
15...
Rhe8 16. Rd2 (16. Bc5 g5 17. Rxd8+ (17. Nd5 Re2 18. Ne3 Rxf2=)
17... Rxd8 18. Nh5 Rd5 19. Be3 Nb4
)
16... Re4 17. f3 Rd4! 18. Rxd4 Nxd4 19. Be5 g5 20. Bxd4 Rxd4 (20... gxf4 21. Rd1
)
21. Ne2
17. Ng3 Bg6 18. c4 Re6 19. c5 b6
19... Be6 20. Rd2 Na5 21. Rhd1 Nc4 22. Rd4
20. Rhd1 f6 21. f4! g4 22. f5 Bf7 23. R5d2 Ne5 24. b3 h4 25. Bxe5
25... Rxd2 26. Rxd2 Rxe5 27. Rd4! h3
27... g3!? 28. hxg3 hxg3 29. Ne4! Bd5 (29... Kc7 30. Nxg3
)
30. Nxg3 Bxg2 31. Rd6 Re3 32. Nh5
27... Rxf5 28. Rxg4 Rg5 29. Rxg5 fxg5 30. Ne4 Bd5 31. Nxg5 Bxg2 32. Kd2
28. gxh3 gxh3 29. Ne4
Kc7 30. Nxf6 Kc6 31. Rf4 Re2 32. Ng4 Kd6 33. f6 Rg2 34. Nh6 Ke6 35. Rf3 Kd5
1-0
[Notes based on Huzman]
Sergey Movsesian (2628) - Artem Iljin (2484) [C43]
Warsaw ch-EUR (3) 2005
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. d4 Nxe4 4. Bd3 Nc6 5. Bxe4 d5 6. Bg5!
The best attempt at gaining some tactical advantage from the situation.
6. Nxe5!? dxe4!? (6... Nxe5 7. dxe5 dxe4 8. Qxd8+ Kxd8 transposes to a known line that is slightly better for White, as discussed elsewhere)
7. Nxc6 bxc6 8.
6... f6
a) 6... Qd6 7. dxe5 Qb4+ 8. Nc3 dxe4 9. a3 Qa5 (9... Qxb2 10. Nd5)
10.
b) 6... Qd7 7. Bd3 e4 8.
7. Nxe5 dxe4 8. Qh5+ g6 9. Nxg6 hxg6 10. Qxg6+ Kd7 11. Bxf6 Rh6
11... Rg8 12. Qf5+ Kd6 13. Qf4+ Kd7 14. Bxd8 1-0 Klovans,J-Bick,J/Groningen 1996 (14).
12. Qf5+
12. Qxh6 Bxh6 13. Bxd8 Kxd8 14.
12... Ke8 13. Qxe4+ Be7 14. Be5 Nxe5 15. dxe5 Rh4 16. f4 Qd7 17. g3 Rh6 18. Nc3 c6 19. Rd1 Qh3 20. Rd2 Bf5 21. Qf3 Qh5 22. Qe3 Qg6 23. Kd1 b6 24. Kc1 Kf7 25. Ne2 Be4 26. Rf1 Rxh2 27. f5 Bxf5 28. Qe4 Kg7 29. Qxf5 Qxf5 30. Rxf5 Rh1+ 31. Rd1 Rxd1+ 32. Kxd1 Rd8+ 33. Ke1 Rd5 34. Nf4 Ra5 35. a3 1-0
Leonid D Gofshtein (2498) - Eduardas Rozentalis (2620) [C43]
ISR-chT playoff/Tel Aviv 2002
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. d4 Nxe4 4. Bd3 Nc6
The unexpected idea of Y. Murey. The piece sacrifice is only temporary due to the fork that follows d5 and e4.
5. Nxe5!?
5. d5 Nc5 (5... Nf6!? 6. dxc6 e4 7. cxb7 Bxb7 8. Be2 exf3 9. Bxf3 Bxf3 10. Qxf3 d5 11.
)
6. dxc6 (6. Be2 e4!)
6... e4 7. cxb7 Bxb7 8. Be2 exf3 9. Bxf3
1-0 Jansa,V-Jose Queralto,D/Andorra 1996 (24)
5... Nc5!
5... Nxe5 6. Bxe4 (6. dxe5 Nc5 7. Bf4 (7.
1-0 Van den Doel,E-Kroeze,F/Leeuwarden 1997/EXT 99 (21))
9. Bb5+ Ke7 10. Bxd6+ Qxd6
Thoma,C-Toth,B/Badenweiler op 1995/1/2-1/2 (47))
6... d5 7. dxe5 dxe4 8. Qxd8+ Kxd8 9. Nc3 Bb4 (9... Bf5 10. Bg5+ (10. Be3 Kc8 11.
K 12. Rd4 Bc5 13. Rc4 Bxe3+ 14. fxe3 Kb7 15. Rf1
1-0 Leko,P-Timman,J/Ubeda 1997/ (34))
10... Kc8 11.
1-0 Bezgodov,A-Appleberry,M/Budapest FS06 GM 1996/ (27))
10. Bg5+ (10. Bd2 Re8 11. Bg5+ Be7 12.
1/2-1/2 Vagner,M-Brazina,D/Moravia-ch op 1994 (35) )
10... Ke8 11.
)
12. Rd4 Bxc3 13. bxc3 h6 (13... Bf5 14. Rhd1 f6 15. exf6
)
14. Rxe4!?
1-0 Shirov,A-Timman,J/Wijk aan Zee 1998/CBM 63/[Ftacnik] (52)(14. Bh4 g5 15. Bg3 Bf5 16. Rhd1 Ke7
Schroll,G-Herndl,H/AUT-chT9697 1996/1/2-1/2 (74))
(14. Be3 Bf5 15. Rhd1 Ke7 16. h3 Rhd8 17. g4 Rxd4 18. Rxd4 Be6 19. a3 h5 20. Rxe4 hxg4 21. hxg4 Kd7 22. Rd4+ 1/2-1/2 Sutovsky,E-Lalic,B/Hastings 2000/CBM 75 (22))
6. Bc4!? Nxe5 7. dxe5 d6 8. Qf3 Ne6
8... Qd7!? 9. Nc3 c6 10. Be3 d5
1-0 Schaefer,M-Hacker,C/Senden 1998/CBM 67 ext (21)
9. exd6
9. Bxe6 Bxe6 10. Qxb7 dxe5 11. Qb5+ Qd7
9... Bxd6?!
9... Qxd6!? 10. Be3 (10. Nc3 Qe5+ 11. Be3 Ba3) 10... Qb4+ 11. Nd2 Qxb2
10. Be3
17. Qh5! Qc7 (17... Bxc3 18. Bxe6 g6 (18... Bxe1 19. Ng5
)
19. Qf3
)
18. Bd3 g6 19. Qh4
18. Bd4!?
19... Bxd6 20. Qxc6 Bb7! 21. Qxb7
21. Qxd6 Rad8 22. Qb6 Be4 (22... Rxd3 23. Qxb7=)
23. Bxe4 Qxe4+ 24. Ka1 b4
22. Qe4!? Qe7 (22... Qf6? 23. Bb5
)
23. Bb5 Red8 24. Bc6 Rac8 25. cxb4 Bxb4 26. Rxd8+ Rxd8=
22... Qf6 23. Re2 Red8 24. Red2 Bc5 25. Qe4 Rac8 26. Be2 Re8!
27. Qg4 Bxe3 28. fxe3 Nc5 29. Bf3 Qe5!? 30. Re2 Rcd8 31. Rd4!? Kg7 32. Bd5 Re7 33. Qf3 Rd6 34. Rf4 Rf6 35. Rxf6 Qxf6 36. Kc2 Qe5 37. g3 f5 38. Qf4 Qxf4 39. gxf4 h6 40. Kd2 Kf6 41. Rh2 h5 42. Ke2 Rh7 43. Kf3 h4 44. b3 Rh8
Black has clear advantage but there was draw treaty because of suitable team interests.
Peter Leko (2600) - Jan Hendrik Timman (2630) [C43]
Ubeda (4) 1997
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. d4 Nxe4 4. Bd3 Nc6 5. Nxe5!? Nxe5?!
5... Nc5! is probably better, as in Gofshtein - Rozentalis.
6. dxe5
The more usual way to reach the same ending is by 6. Bxe4 d5 7. dxe5 dxe4 8. Qxd8+ Kxd8 9. Nc3 etc.
6... d5
|
7. Bxe4! dxe4 8. Qxd8+ Kxd8 9. Nc3
White has slightly the better of this ending due to his extra tempo and Black's worse king placement. But Black counts on his long-term advantage of the two Bishops in an open position. White generally has the better of GM games with the line.
9.
)
19... fxe6 20. Rd4 g5 21. Rxe4 Kf7 22. Rd4 Re8 23. Red1 Be5 24. Rg4 Bf6 25. Rb4 b6 26. Rd7+ Re7 27. Rxe7+ Kxe7 28. Ra4 a5 29. Bxb6 Rb5 30. Be3 Bxb2 31. Kf1 Bc1 32. Ke2 Re5 33. Rc4 1/2-1/2 Alekseev,E-Mamedyarov,S/Lausanne 2004 (33).
9... Bf5
A sharper, more tactical continuation is 9... Bb4 10. Bg5+ Ke8 11.
10. Be3
10. Bg5+ Kc8 11.
This seems a slow way of securing the king's position, and White seems to exploit his lead in development to secure the advantage.
12. Rd4 Bc5 13. Rc4 Bxe3+ 14. fxe3 Kb7 15. Rf1 Bg6 16. Nd5 Rhd8 17. Ne7! Rd7 18. Nxg6 fxg6 19. Rxe4 Re7 20. e6 Rae8 21. Rf7 Rxe6 22. Rxe6 Rxe6 23. Rxg7 Rxe3 24. Kd2 Re5 25. Rxh7 Rd5+ 26. Ke3 Re5+ 27. Kf2 Rf5+ 28. Kg1 Rd5 29. h4 Rd2 30. Rg7 Rxc2 31. Rxg6 Rxb2 32. h5 Rd2 33. h6 Rd8 34. h7 Rh8 35. Rg7
1-0
Nigel David Short (2690) - Jan Hendrik Timman (2630) [C43]
Wijk aan Zee (8) 1997
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. d4 Nxe4 4. Bd3 Nc6 5. d5 Nc5
a) Similar, but not as good, is 5... Nf6 6. dxc6 e4 7. cxb7 Bxb7 8. Be2 exf3 9. Bxf3 Qe7+ 10. Be3 Bxf3 11. Qxf3 Qe4 12. Nd2 Qxf3 13. Nxf3
Bb4+ 14. c3 Ba5 15.
b) Losing, however, is 5... Ne7? 6. Bxe4 f5 7. d6 1-0 Kahn,E-Weiler,W/Budapest FSIMB 2007 (7).
6. dxc6
A very interesting alternative is 6.
)
8. Nxe5 d6 (8... Nf5!? 9. Re1 Be7)
9. Qa4+ Bd7 10. Nxd7 Qxd7 11. Qb3
6... e4 7. cxb7 Bxb7 8. Be2 exf3 9. Bxf3 Bxf3 10. Qxf3
|
White has a slight edge due to his superior pawns for the ending, but nothing more.
10... Bd6!?
a) The text move appears to improve upon an earlier encounter between the same opponents, which continued instead 10... Be7 11.
)
21... Bd4? (21... Nc3 22. Nxc3 Bxc3 23. b5
)
22. Kf1 Bxf2 23. Nxc7 Rec8 24. Rxd7 Nc3 25. Rb2 Bh4 26. Bf4 Bf6 27. b5 h5 28. h3 Rb7 29. Rbd2 Ne4 30. R2d5 Nc3 31. Rxh5 Nxa2 32. c5 Nb4 33. c6 Nxc6 34. bxc6 Rb1+ 35. Ke2 a3 36. Ra5 Rb2+ 37. Kf3 a2 38. Nd5 Rxc6 39. Nxf6+ Rxf6 40. Rd6 Rf5 41. Ra8+ Kh7 42. h4 Rc5 43. g3 f5 44. Rd2 1-0 Short,N-Timman,J/Groningen 1996 (44)
10... Qe7+?! 11. Be3 Qe4 12. Nd2 Qxf3 13. Nxf3 Ne6 14.
11. Be3
11. Bg5 Qb8 12. Nc3 Ne6 13. h4 c6 14.
11.
11...
13.
13... c6 14.
Black plays to exchange pawns and eliminate any White edge.
18. c4 Bxb2 19. cxd5 cxd5 20. Rxd5 Qc7 21. Rb1 Ba3 22. Nd4 Bb4
22... Qc4!?
23. Rc1 Nxd4 24. Rxd4 Qe5 25. Rcd1 Qe6 26. a4 Rac8 27. Qd5 1/2-1/2
Lazaro Bruzon Bautista - Vassily Ivanchuk [C43]
Carlos Torre Wimbledon 20th/Merida (1) 2007
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. d4 Nxe4 4. dxe5?!
Sveshnikov and others persist in playing this move, but it seems unclear at best if Black gets aggressive.
4... Bc5!
This move seems to put this variation under a question mark, even though it is otherwise very playable.
5. Qd5
Diagram #
5. Bc4!? Nxf2! (5... Bxf2+ 6. Ke2 c6 7. Bd3)
6. Qd5 (6. Bxf7+ Kxf7 7. Qd5+ Ke8 8. Qxc5 Nxh1 9. Bg5 d6
10. Qe3 Qd7 11. Nc3 h6 12. Bh4 Vargha - Ostriker, Corr. 1978-1979)
6... Qe7 7. Rf1 c6
5... Bxf2+
5... Nxf2? 6. Qxc5 Nxh1 allows White to gain two pieces for a Rook eventually, which is a winning advantage in material. 7. Nc3 (7. Bc4 Qe7 8. Qxe7+ Kxe7 9. Nc3 c6 10. Ne4 Na6 11. Bg5+ Kf8 12. Nd6 h6 13. Be3 Nb4 14. Kd2 Ng3 15. hxg3 b5 16. Bxf7 Na6 17. Nh4 Ke7 18. Ng6+ Kd8 19. Nxh8 Nb4 20. Rf1 Kc7 21. a3 Nd5 22. Bxd5 cxd5 23. Rf8 Bb7 24. Nxb5+ Kc6 25. Rxa8 Bxa8 26. Nxa7+ Kb7 27. Nf7 Kc7 28. Nd6 d4 29. Bxd4 Bxg2 30. Ne8+ Kd8 31. Nxg7 Ke7 32. Nf5+ Ke6 33. Nxh6 d6 34. exd6 Kxd6 35. c4 Be4 36. Nb5+ Kd7 37. Ng4 Kc6 38. Ne5+ Kb7 39. Nd6+ Kc7 40. Nxe4 Kd8 41. g4 Kc7 42. g5 Kd8 43. Nc6+ Kc7 1-0 Tasci,S-Belgin,G/Kocaeli 2002 (43))
(7. Qg1!?)
7... Nc6 8. Bd3 Qe7 9. Qxe7+ Nxe7 10. Kf1
6. Kd1?!
6. Ke2 f5 7. Nc3 c6 8. Nxe4!? An incredible queen sacrifice, which is endorsed by Forintos and Haag.(8. Qd3
)
9. Qc4+ d5 10. exd6+ Kh8 11. Nxe4 fxe4 12. Kxf2 exf3 13. gxf3 Qxd6 14. Rg1 Nd7 15. Rg3 Ne5 16. Qc3 Bg4 17. f4 Rae8 18. Be3 Rf7 19. Kg1 Nf3+ 20. Kh1 Qh6 21. h3 Bh5 22. Rd1 Nh4 23. f5 Bf3+ 24. Kh2 Qh5 25. Bd4 Nxf5 26. Rxf3 Nxd4 27. Rxf7 Qxd1 28. Bg2 Ne6 29. Rxb7 Qd6+ 30. Qg3 Qf8 31. Rxa7 Nd4 32. Rd7 c5 33. c3 Ne2 34. Qf3 Nf4 35. Ra7 Kg8 36. Ra8 g5 37. b4 cxb4 38. cxb4 Kf7 39. Qb7+ Qe7 40. Rxe8 Qxb7 41. Bxb7 Kxe8 42. Be4 1-0 Baumann,H-Swierczewski,J/Germany email 2005 (42))
8... cxd5 9. Nd6+ Kf8 10. Kxf2 Nc6 (10... Qb6+ 11. Kg3 Nc6 12. Bf4)
11. Kg3 (11. Be3 d4 12. Bf4
Forintos and Haag, but I don't realy buy it.)
11... Qb6 12. Bf4 g5!? 13. Nxg5 Nxe5 14. Bxe5 Qe3+ 15. Nf3 Rg8+ 16. Kh3 Rg6 17. Re1 Qh6+ 18. Nh4 Rxd6 19. Bxd6+ Qxd6 20. Bd3 Qh6 21. Rhf1 d6 22. g4 f4 23. Bxh7 Be6 24. Rxf4+ Kg7 25. Kg3 Kxh7 26. Nf3 Rg8 27. h4 Bxg4 28. Re7+ Kh8 29. Rxg4 Rxg4+ 30. Kxg4 Qg6+ 31. Ng5 Qf6 32. Rf7 Qd4+ 33. Kh5 b5 34. Kg6 Kg8 35. Rf8+ Kxf8 36. Ne6+ 1-0 Glavina Rossi,P-Juarez,A/Buenos Aires 1987
6... f5 7. Bc4 Qe7 8. Nc3 c6 9. Qd3 b5 10. Bb3 a5 11. a4 b4 12. Nxe4 fxe4 13. Qe2 d5 14. exd6 Qxd6+ 15. Bd2 e3 16. Rf1 Ba6 17. Bc4 Bxc4 18. Qxc4 Ra7 19. Ke2 Re7 20. Be1 Qg6 21. g3 Re4 22. Qd3 Nd7 23. Rd1
Jonny Hector (2533) - Arturs Neiksans (2470) [C43]
Four Nations Chess Challenge/Oslo NOR (3) 2008
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. d4 exd4 4. e5 Ne4 5. Qe2
5. Qxd4 d5 6. exd6 Nxd6 7. Nc3 Nc6 8. Qf4 Nf5!?
The newest of many moves that have been analyzed here. White generally has a pull, but Black equalizes with careful play. 9. Bb5 (9. Nb5 Bb4+ 10. c3 Ba5=)
9... Bd6 10. Qe4+ Qe7 11. Bg5 (11.
Karpov)
11... f6 12. Bd2 Bd7 13.
)
16... Nd6 17. Nxd6+ Bxd6 18. Rde1+ and now 18...Be7 would hold the balance notes Karpov. 1/2-1/2 Kasparov,G-Karpov,A/WC Match 1990
5... Nc5
5... Bb4+ 6. Nbd2 Nxd2 7. Bxd2 Bxd2+ 8. Qxd2 d6 (8...
6... Be7 7. Nc3 c6 (7...
Steinitz)
8. Be3 d6 9.
7. Be3
7. Nxc6 dxc6 8. Nc3 Bf5 9. Be3 h5 10. Rd1 Qe7 11. Rd2 Nd7 12. f4
Klavin - Vistanetsky, Tbilsi 1962 13. Bxa7?! Qb4 Forintos and Haag
7... Nxd4
a) 7... Nxe5?! 8. Nb5 Ne6 (8... Na6 9. Bd4 d6 10. f4) 9. f4
b) 7... Be7 8. Nxc6 dxc6 9. Nc3 Bf5 10. g4 Bg6 11. Rd1 Qc8 12. Bg2
c) 7... b6 8. Nxc6 dxc6 9. Nc3 Qe7 10. f4
8... Qh4! 9. Be3 Qb4+ 10. c3 Qe4 (10... Nd3+? 11. Qxd3 Qxb2 12. Qb5 Qxa1 13. Bc4 Ba3 14. Qb3
Forintos and Haag)
11. f4 d5 12. Nd2 Qg6 13. Nf3 c6 14.
9... d5 10. exd6 Qxd6 11. Nd2 Bd7 12. Nc4 Qe7 13.
10... d5 11. exd6 Qxd6 12. Nc4 Qc5 13. 
11.
d5 12. exd6 Qxd6 13. Nf3
13. Nc4
13... Qf4+ 14. Kb1 Bd6 15. g3 Qa4 16. Bg2 Bd7 17. Ne5 Bb5 18. Qh5 f6 19. Bd5 Rae8 20. Ng4!?
20... Bc6 21. Rd4 Qb5 22. a4 Qc5 23. Rhd1 Bxd5 24. Rxd5 Qc6 25. Qh4 Nc5
|
26. Nxf6+ gxf6 27. Rg5+ Kf7 28. Qxh7+ Ke6 29. Re1+ Be5 30. Bxe5 fxg5 31. Bg7+ Kd5 32. c4+ Kxc4 33. Qc2+ Kb4 34. Bc3+ Kc4 35. Ba5+ Kd4 36. Qc3+ Kd5 37. Qd2+ 1-0
Copyright © 2008 by Michael Goeller