The Monte Carlo French
French Exchange Variation with c4

By Michael Goeller
The Monte Carlo Exchange Variation of the French Defense (1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.exd5 exd5 4.c4) reaches positions that often occur by transposition from other openings (especially the Queen's Gambit Accepted). This is a great "first line" against the French for developing players, but there are also a number of strong masters (especially Normunds Miezis) who play this all the time with success. Often under-estimated by opponents, it contains a number of tactical ideas and attacking motifs that may not be familiar to many players. Theory is probably right that White does not get much of an edge this way, but he does get a wild and wide-open game, which may not be the sort of thing the typical French Defense player wants. He also gets to reach exactly the type of positions he wants to play, without allowing Black to dictate. And for players who prefer open positions (and what 1.e4 player does not?) it can be a wonderful thing to side-step the closed positions so typical of this opening. White does have to be prepared to accept an isolated pawn, but anyone who likes to control the center and have open lines and outposts for his pieces should enjoy that.
In general, White's attack with 4.c4 blasts open the position and forces both players to battle for the initiative. Therefore, any defensive play by White is out of place. This is especially true in the line most frequently recommended by theory, 4...Bb4+ 5.Nc3 Ne7, where White must be ready to sacrifice a pawn, in my view, after 6.Nf3 Nbc6 7.a3! Bxc3+ 8.bxc3 O-O 9.Bd3 dxc4 10.Bxc4 Nd5 (the book "refutation") with 11.O-O! (not considered by theory as far as I have seen). I also examine other lines where White must sacrifice a pawn or aggressively advance his pawns on the kingside in order to keep the initiative.
What follows is a selective "repertoire" for White and an introduction to the line where I have recommended the sharpest choices. However, I include a bibliography for those who want to do their own research and pave their own way. I have also included a few of my own games, which were the easiest to find to illustrate my first tactical theme -- the Bishop trap...
Game One
Garry Kasparov - Fritz 3 [C01]
Munich Intel Express 1994
1. e3!?
This move order is obviously intended as an anti-computer strategy, especially well suited to blitz play. The game position could also arise via
1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. exd5 exd5 4. c4 dxc4 5. Bxc4 Bb4+ etc.
1... d5 2. c4 dxc4 3. Bxc4 e5 4. d4 exd4 5. exd4 Bb4+ 6. Nc3 Nf6 7. Nf3
|
9. Be3
A better illustration of the Bishop trap motif can be found in another game from the match: 9. h3 Bh5 (9... Bxf3 10. Qxf3 Qxd4 11. Qxb7
)
10. g4 Bg6 11. Ne5 Nc6 12. Be3 Nxe5 13. dxe5 Nd7 (13... Bxc3 14. bxc3 Ne4 15. Qxd8 Raxd8 16. f4 h6 17. f5 Bh7 18. e6
Baburin)
14. f4 Nb6 15. Bb3?! (
15. Bxb6! axb6 16. Qxd8 Raxd8 17. f5 Rd2 18. fxg6 hxg6 19. e6
Baburin)
15... Bd3! 16. Qf3?! White gets insufficient compensation for the Exchange.(
16. Rf2! Nc4 17. Qf3
)
16... Bxf1 17. Rxf1 c6 18. f5 Qe7 19. f6 Qxe5 20. fxg7 Kxg7 21. Ne4 Nd5
0-1 Kasparov,G-Fritz 3/Munich Express 1994 (47).
9... a5
This is not an especially meaningful move, though it does defend the loose Bishop at b4.
10. h3 Bh5 11. g4! Bg6 12. Ne5 Nbd7 13. f4 Nxe5 14. dxe5 Qe8
Not 14... Qxd1 15. Nxd1! Nd7 16. e6!
Even stronger is 16. f5! Qxe5 but it gets quite tactically complex, which may be why Kasparov chose the simpler line against the computer: 17. fxg6 hxg6 (17... Nxc3 18. bxc3 Bxc3 19. Bxf7+ Kh8 20. Rf5
)
18. Rd1! Bd6 19. Bf4! Qc5+ 20. Kg2 Rae8 (20... Qxc4 21. Qxe4)
21. Bd5 Nf6 22. Bxd6
16... Bxc3
17. bxc3 Qc6 18. Ba2 h6 19. f5! Bh7
The Bishop is entombed, so that White may as well be up a piece for the remainder of the game.
20. Bd4 Ng5 21. Qe3 Rfe8 22. h4! Ne4 23. g5!
The immediate 23. Rae1 Nd6 is a little less clear, while with the pawn at g5 White can meet Nd6 with g6 and Qg3 winning a piece due to the double attack on Bishop and Knight.
|
Nor 24... b6 25. Rae1 Nc5 26. g6
25. e6!
White blasts open all lines leading to Black's king.
25... fxe6 26. fxe6 Re7 27. Rae1 b5? 28. Qxe4 Qxe4 29. Rxe4 b4 30. Rf7 b3 31. Bxb3 c5 32. Rxe7 cxd4 1-0
Game Two
goeller - Rambaldi (1807) [C01]
ICC 5 0 u/Internet Chess Club 2007
1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. exd5 exd5 4. c4 dxc4 5. Bxc4 Nf6 6. Nf3 Be7
A typical error here is 6... Bg4? 7. Bxf7+! Kxf7 8. Ne5+ Kg8 9. Nxg4 Bd6 1-0 Kuip-De Vries/Den Haag 1979 (9).
The Bishop is often exposed on this square, but you will find that most of your opponents will do this automatically. At the very least, White should get the two Bishops in an open position, which can't be too bad.
Imitating Kasparov, of course!
|
Black is already in quite a bit of trouble, but this move simply loses.
a) 13... Be4 14. Qb3 (14. g5 Nd5)
14... Bd5 15. Bxd5 cxd5 16. Nxd5
b) 13... Qc7 14. f5 Nxe5 15. dxe5 Qxe5 16. Qf3 Bc5 17. Bf2
14. Nxd7
14. f5 also wins.
14... Qxd7 15. f5 Nxc3 16. bxc3 Bxf5 17. Rxf5 Bh4 18. Qf3 Rae8 19. Rf1
Black resigns
1-0Game Three
goeller - mathou (1804) [C01]
ICC 5 0 u/Internet Chess Club 2007
1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. exd5 exd5 4. c4 dxc4 5. Bxc4 Nf6 6. Nf3 Bd6 7.
With White's Bishop at g5, the plan of g4, Ne5, and f4 does not seem to work as well. But White has other possibilities here.
10. Nc3
White should probably complete his development before beginning kingside operations. But maybe White can get away with the aggressive
10. g4 Bg6 11. Ne5 Nbd7 12. f4!? Bxb1!?
(12... Nb6?! 13. f5! Bxe5 14. dxe5 Qxd1 (14... Nxc4 15. exf6 Qxd1 16. Rxd1 h6 17. fxg7 Kxg7 18. Bf4 Bh7 19. Rc1 Na5 20. Rxc7
)
15. Rxd1 Ne4 (15... h6 16. Bb3!
)
16. Be7 Nxc4 (16... Rfe8 17. Bd3)
17. Rd4
)
13. Rxb1 Nb6 14. Bb3 Be7 15. Qd3 and Bc2 with attacking prospects.
10... c6 11. Ne4! Be7 12. Ng3! Bg6 13. Ne5 Nbd7 14. f4 Nd5?
|
Threatening Ne3 and Bxg5, but failing to account for White's bigger threat of f5. Better 14... Nxe5! 15. dxe5 (15. fxe5 Nd5=)
15... Ne4! works due to the loose Knight at g3 when after(15... Nd5 16. Bxe7 Qxe7 17. Bxd5 cxd5 18. f5 Qxe5 19. Qd3
)
16. Bxe7 Qxe7 the threats of Qc5+ and Nxg3 force further exchanges, but White still keeps an edge after 17. Nxe4 Bxe4 18. Qd6!
16. Nxd7
More precise is 17. Nxd7! Qxd7 18. f5
17... Qg5?
17... Nxe5 18. dxe5 Qxe5 19. Qf3
18. Qf3
Black resigns
1-0Game Four
goeller - SlapJack (1950) [C01]
ICC 5 0 u/Internet Chess Club 2007
1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. exd5 exd5 4. c4 Nf6 5. Nc3 Be7 6. Nf3
|
a) 14... Nbd5 15. f4 Bb4 16. f5
b) 14... Bb4 15. f4! Bxc3 16. bxc3 Nfd5 (16... h6? 17. Nxg6
)
17. f5
15. f4!
The Bishop trap theme returns, aided here by the fact that Black cannot play h6 due to the pin on the f-pawn and the Knight's attack on the Bishop at g6.
Another idea here is 15. h4!? Nbd7 16. h5
which should also win.
15... Nfd5
16. f5
Bh4 17. fxg6 hxg6 18. Rf1 Re7 19. Ne4 f6 20. Nxg6 Rxe4 21. Nxh4 Qd6 22. Nf5 Qe6 23. Qf3 Re8 24. Bd2 g6 25. Ng3 Rxd4 26. Rae1 Qf7 27. Bc3 Rf4 28. Rxe8+
Black resigns
1-0Game Five
Steven Geirnaert - Charles F Kuijpers [C01]
Vlissingen HZ op 7th/Vlissingen (2) 2003
1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. exd5 exd5 4. c4 Bb4+ 5. Nc3 Ne7
This is the "book" remedy, first proposed by John Watson and well demonstrated by his student, Tal Shaked. Black's idea is to pressure the d-pawn with an eventual Nbc6 and Nf5. The Knight is also better placed here to block checks on the e-file, sidestep the pin by Bg5, and prevent White from so easily using the e5 square. However, I think White has a remedy.
6. Nf3
6. a3 Bxc3+ 7. bxc3
6... Nbc6
|
6...
7. a3!
I like this move, which secures the two Bishops in an open position and gains more support for White's pawn center. Burgess says that "White probably cannot afford this," but I think White can if he is willing to sac a pawn for rapid development (an idea Burgess does not consider).
7... Bxc3+
Of course, the Bishop is trapped after 7... Ba5? 8. b4 Bb6? 9. c5 -- a nice echo of our theme in the previous games.
This exchange does not trouble White at all.
On 9... dxc4 10. Bxc4 Nd5 White must sacrifice a pawn, Giuoco Piano style, with 11.
)
(11. Bd2?! Re8+ 12. Be2 Qe7 13. c4 Nb6 (13... Bf5!? 14. cxd5? Bc2! 15. Bg5
Bxd1 16. Bxe7 Bxe2 17. dxc6 Bxf3
)
14. Be3 Bg4 15.
)
16... Bxf3! 17. gxf3 (17. Bxf3 Nxc4
)
17... Ne5 18. Qb3 Nbxc4! 19. Bxc4? Nxf3+ 20. Kg2 Qe4! 21. Kh3 Re5 (21... Qh4+ 22. Kg2 Qg4+ 23. Kh1 Nh4 24. Rg1 Qf3+ 25. Rg2 Qxg2#)
22. Be2 Rdxd5 23. Qc4 Rh5+ 24. Kg3 Rdg5+ 25. Bxg5 Rxg5+ 26. Kh3 Qf5+ 0-1 Santo Roman,M-Shaked,T/Cannes 1997 (26))
11... Nxc3 (11... b5 12. Bg5 f6? 13. Bxb5
)
12. Qd3 Nd5 13. Re1!
and White's two Bishops, central pawn, and attacking chances (with ideas like Ng5, d5, Bb2, Bb3-c2, and Rad1) certainly compensate for the pawn.
10.
With his central pawns, potential b-file pressure, and square control (aided by the dark-squared Bishop), White has some potential for an edge, so Black tries to exchange pieces. White can probably exploit his edge most easily in the ending and should probably accept the exchange. No better, though, is
12... Qd6 13. a4!? Rfe8 14. Ba3 Qf4 15. Rfe1
.
13. Qd3!?
Better 13. Qxd5! Nxd5 14. c4 Nb6 15. Rb1
and White has real pressure with ideas like Bf4, c5 and Rxb7. If White gets a passed d-pawn with his Bishop on c7, that could be very dangerous for Black.
13... Ng6 14. Rb1! b6 15. Rb5! Qd7 16. Rh5!?
The Rook swing is typical of these isolani positions, though this one is a bit unorthodox.
16... Rfe8 17. Rd1 Rad8 18. h3 a5 19. Ng5 h6 20. Ne4 Qe6 21. Ng3 Nce7 22. c4 Qf6 23. Ne4 Qe6 24. Nc3! f5 25. d5 Qf7 26. Qg3 Kh7?
Better 26... Nc8!
and White will need to sacrifice material to maintain his initiative. 27. Nb5! Nf4 28. Bxf4 Qxh5 29. Rd3
.
27... Nf4 28. Rxh6+! gxh6 29. Bxf4
28. Qg4 Nc8 29. Rf5 Qe7 30. Bxf4 Nxf4 31. Qxf4
Nd6
32. Nxd6 Qxd6 33. Qd4 Rf8 34. Rxf8 Rxf8 35. Qd3+ Kh8 36. Re1 Qf4 37. Re2 Qc1+ 38. Kh2 Qf4+ 39. g3 Qd6 40. Qe3 Kh7 41. Kg2 Rd8 42. Qe4+ Kh8 43. Qe7 b5!? 44. Qxd6 Rxd6 45. Re7
45. Re6! Rd7 46. Kf3 bxc4 47. Ke4 Kg8 48. Rc6
45... bxc4 46. Rxc7 Rxd5 47. Rxc4 Kh7 48. a4 Kg6 49. Rc6+ Kf5 50. g4+ Ke4 51. Re6+ Kf4 52. Rg6 Rg5?! 53. Rxg5 hxg5 54. f3 Ke3 55. Kg3 g6 56. Kg2 Ke2 57. h4!
The only way to win. After 57...gxh4 58.f4 White will force through his pawn to Queen.
1-0Game Six
Normunds Miezis - Manfred Kahn [C00]
Dresden op 01st/Dresden 1992
1. c4 e6 2. e4 d5 3. exd5 exd5 4. d4 Bb4+ 5. Nc3 Ne7 6. Nf3
|
a) 9... Bxc3 10. bxc3 Nxc3 11. Qb3! ( with no Black Knight at c6 to threaten Na5, this is strong, but also good is the standard 11. Qd3 Nd5 12. Ng5
)
11... Ne4 12. Re1 Nd6 (12... Nf6 13. Ba3
)
13. Bg5! Qd7 14. Ne5 Qf5 15. Be7 Nxc4 (15... Re8? 16. Bxd6
)
16. Bxf8
b) 9... Nb6! 10. Bb3 Bg4 11. Qd3
.
a) 11... Bg4? 12. Ba3! wins the Exchange since 12... Re8? 13. Qb3! is even worse.
b) 11... c5?! 12. Ng5! (12. dxc5!?
)
12... Qf6! All pawn captures lose by the same idea:(12... Qxd4? 13. Qh5 Bf5 (13... h6 14. Bxf7+ Kh8 15. Qg6!
)
14. Bxf7+ Kh8 15. Nxh7!
)
(12... Bxd4? 13. Qh5 Bf5 14. Bxf7+ Kh8 15. Nxh7!
)
(12... cxd4 13. Qh5 Bf5 14. Bxf7+ Kh8 15. Nxh7! Bxh7 16. Bg6)
13. Qe2! Nc6! (White threatened 14.Nxf7 and Qe8+) 14. Ne4! (14. Nxf7!? Nxd4 15. Ng5+ Kh8 16. Qh5 Bf5 17. Rxb7 Bg6 18. Qh3
)
14... Qxd4 15. Rd1 Qe5 16. Rd5 Nd4 17. Qe3
13. Qb3 Rxf3!
is stronger than in the game.
13... Rxf3
13... Ba5 14. Rb5! c5 15. Ng5!
With his pawns broken, Black has insufficient compensation for the Exchange.
16. Qc6 e5 17. Be3 Nb6 18. Bxd4 exd4 19. Rfd1 d3 20. h3 Rc8 21. a4
1-0
Game Seven
Normunds Miezis - Frode Bull Jaeger [C00]
Politiken Cup 26th/Copenhagen (1) 2004
1. c4 e6 2. e4 d5 3. exd5 exd5 4. d4 Bb4+ 5. Nc3 Ne7 6. Nf3 Bg4?! 7. h3!
a) 7. Be3 is playable and transposes to lines considered later, e.g.: 7... Nbc6 8. Bd3 dxc4 9. Bxc4
Be6!? 21. Qxf6 gxf6 22. Nd3 Ba5 23. Nc5! (23. Bxe6 Rxe6 24. Rxe6 fxe6 25. Rxe6 Kf7 26. Nf4 Nc4 27. Ne4
)
23... Bc8 24. N5e4 Nxe4 25. Rxe4 Rxe4 26. Rxe4 Kf8 27. h3 f5 28. Rh4 Kg7 29. d5! Bxc3 30. bxc3 cxd5 31. Rd4! Kf6 32. f4!? b5 33. Rxd5 Rxd5 34. Bxd5 Be6 35. Bc6 Bxa2 36. Bxb5 Ke7 37. Kf2 Kd6 38. Ke3 Kc5 39. Bd7 Bb1 40. Be8 Ba2 41. Bd7 Bd5 1/2-1/2 Miezis,N-Pedersen,S/Gausdal 2000 (41)
b) 7. a3!? is also interesting, e.g.: 7... Bxc3+ 8. bxc3 Nbc6 9. h3 Bh5 10. Bd3 dxc4 11. Bxc4
giving White some chances of using his two Bishops and potentially mobile center pawns.
a) 9.
)
(9... Nxd4? 10. Qa4+ Ndc6 11. cxd5!
)
(9...
)
10. Bxc4 
9... dxc4 10. Bxc4
12... Bd6 13. g4! Nxe3
14. fxe3 Bg6 15. e4
is sharp but promising for White.
13. bxc3 Na5 14. Ba2!? Nd6 15. Re1 Nac4 16. Bc1 Re8 17. g4 Bg6 18. Ne5 Nxe5 19. dxe5 Ne4?
|
This loses to a familiar tactic, but White has the edge due to his space and two Bishopsafter 19... Qe7 20. Qf3
or 19... Nb5 20. Bb2
Black must lose either the Knight or the Bishop.
1-0
Game Eight
Maurice Ashley (2435) - Alexander Shabalov (2590) [C01]
New York Enhanced/Marshall Chess Club 1993
The following game is one of my favorites to show to students, for whom GM Ashley is an excellent role model. It was played at the Marshall Chess Club the same year that Shabalov won the US Championship. I like how well it illustrates the fight for the center and initiative, as well as the power of the pin.
1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. exd5 exd5 4. c4
Against the quiet 4. Bd3 Black can seriously consider turning the tables with 4... c5 as in the following well-known miniature: 5. Nf3 Nc6 6. Qe2+ Be7 7. dxc5 Nf6 8. h3?!
Black typically pins White's Knights.
5... Be7 6. Bd3
The present game suggests that this move is overly aggressive.
6...
7. Nge2
A viable alternative system made popular by Ashley and Waitzkin. Developing the Knight to e2 avoids the pin by Bg4 and supports the Knight at c3.
7... Nc6 8. cxd5 Nxd5 9. dxc5 Bg4?!
9... Nxc3 10. Nxc3 (10. bxc3 Bxc5= Tangborn)
10... Qe7+ 11. Be3 Bxc5 12.
|
12. Qc2!
A critical improvement on an earlier game with this line that Shabalov had played against Josh Waitzkin, of "Searching for Bobby Fischer" and "The Art of Learning" fame, which continued:
12. Qe1?! Qxd3! 13. Nxc3+ Be6 14. Qe3 Rd8 15. Rb1
A cool pin. Black is temporarily up a piece but has two pieces hanging. Note that the Bishop at d3 is immune from capture due to the pin on the e-file.
13... Qd4
|
13... 
14. Bb2!
A second pin!
14...
Breaking the pin on the e-file.
15... Kb8 16. Bxc3 Bd3! 17. Bxd3 Qxd3 18. Qxd3 Rxd3 19. Bxg7
16. Bxc3 Bd3 17. Qc1! Qc4 18. Re4!! Nd4
Walking into a pin, but Black had to save his queen and clear a space for the King. Not 18... Bxe4? 19. Qf4+
19. Qf4+ Kc6 20. Bxd4 Rd5 21. Bxg7 Qxc5 22. Rc1!
One last pin wins the game.
1-0Game Nine
Maurice Ashley - Thomas Shih [C01]
US Amateur Team East/Parsippany (6) 1999
1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. exd5 exd5 4. c4 Nc6!
Reminiscent of the Chigorin Defense, the Knight here puts pressure on d4. Black strives for rapid development. Ashley shows an interesting way for White to stifle any Black counterplay.
5. Nc3
5. Nf3 Bg4 seems to play into Black's plan, but Miezis has somehow made this work: 6. Be2 dxc4 7.
Nf6 20. Qc4 Qe4 21. Rd4 Qe3+ 22. Kh2 h5 23. Kh1 Ne4 24. Rxe4 Qxa7 25. Qxf7 Qb6 26. Be2 Qxb2 27. Bxh5 Kb8 28. Bf3 Rdf8 29. Qc4 g5 30. Re2 Qb6 31. Qc3 Bb4 32. Qb2 gxf4 33. Rb1 Rd8 34. Re4 Bd2 35. Qc2 Qd6 36. Ra4 c6 37. Rxb7+ Kxb7 38. Qb3+ Bb4 39. Rxb4+ Kc8 40. Bg4+ Rd7 41. Bxd7+ Kxd7 42. Rb7+ Kc8 43. Ra7 1-0 Miezis,N-Berg,E/Oslo 2008.
5... Nf6
5... dxc4 6. Bxc4!? (6. Be3 Nf6 7. Bxc4 Bd6 8. h3 (8. Nf3!?)
8...
)
6... Bd6 (6... Nxd4 7. Nge2
(7. Be3
)
)
7. Nf3 Nf6 (7... Nge7? 8. Ng5!
)
8.
avoids committing the Bishop prematurely to e3.
6. c5!?
This looks like a good idea in this exact position, where an immediate b6 by Black is dangerous. The pawn cramps Black's development and temporarily relieves the indirect pressure on the d-pawn.
6... Bf5
7. Bb5! a6 8. Bxc6+ bxc6 9. Nf3 Be7 10. Ne5
Black's shattered pawns make for a long-term advantage for White.
10...
13... Nxc3 14. bxc3 Bd7 15. Bf4 f6 16. Nxd7 Qxd7 17. Qe2 Kf7 18. Qd3 f5 19. Be5 Bf6 20. f4 Bxe5 21. Rxe5 g6 22. Rae1 Rfe8 23. Kf2 Rxe5 24. fxe5 Ke6 25. Rb1 Qc8 26. Qh3 Rb8 27. Qxh7 Rxb1 28. Qxg6+ Ke7 29. Qf6+ Ke8 30. Qh8+ Kd7 31. e6+ Kxe6 32. Qxc8+
1-0
Game Ten
Gert Iskov - Henrik Danielsen [C01]
Politiken Cup 09th /Copenhagen (7) 1987
1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. exd5 exd5 4. Nf3 Nf6 5. c4 Bb4+ 6. Nc3
7. Be2 dxc4 (7... Ne4?! 8. Qb3!
Klinger - Glek, Werfen Opoen 1990.)
8. 
Winning a pawn is too risky for Black as White uses the extra time to speed his development: 8... Ng4?! 9.
Bd6 14. g4 g6 15. gxf5 Bxf5 16. Qd2 c6 17. Ne3 Bf4 18. Qf2 Be4 19. Ng2 Bh6 20. Ne5 f5 21. Nf7 1-0 Khetsuriani,B-Karountzos,N/Athens GRE 2007)
10. bxc3 Nxe3 11. fxe3 Rxe3 12. Ne5 Rxd3 13. Nxd3
dxc4 14. Qf3 f6 15. Nf4 Nc6 16. Rae1 Bf5 17. Qe2 Bg6 18. Nxg6 hxg6 19. Qxc4+ Kf8 20. Rf3 1-0 Spartak Vysochin-Igor Zakharevich/St. Petersburg (Russia) 2003.
a) 9... Nbd7 10. Qb3 Bxc3 11. bxc3 Bxf3 12. gxf3 Nb6 13. c5 Nc4 14. Rae1 Qc8 (14... Nxe3 15. fxe3 b6 16. c6 (16. cxb6 axb6 17. e4)
16... Re6 17. e4 Rxc6 18. Kh1! (18. exd5?! Nxd5 (18... Qxd5 19. Qxd5 Nxd5 20. Be4)
19. Be4 Rd6 20. c4 Nf4 21. Bxa8 Qg5+ 22. Kf2 Nh3+ 23. Ke2 Rxd4 24. Rd1 Nf4+=)
(18. e5?! Nh5! 19. f4 Nxf4 20. Rxf4 Qg5+
)
18... Re6 19. e5 Nh5 20. f4 Rh6 21. Rf2 c6 (21... Qh4 22. Qxd5)
22. Qd1 Qh4 23. Qf3)
15. Kg2 b6 16. cxb6 axb6 17. Bc1 Qa6 18. Bb1 h6 19. Rg1 Qc8 20. Qd1 Qd7 21. Kh1 Rxe1 22. Qxe1 Re8 23. Qf1 Kh8 24. Bf4 Rg8 25. Qg2 c6 26. Bc1 Qe6 27. Bd3 b5 28. Qg3 Ne8 29. Bf4 Ned6 30. Qh4 Re8 31. Qh5 Qf6 32. Rg4 Re1+ 33. Kg2 Re8 34. Bg3 Rg8 35. Be5 Qe6 36. Rg6 1-0 Korchnoi,V-Van der Stricht,G/Plovdiv, Bulgaria 2003
b) 9... c6 10. Rc1 a6 11. Bg5 Bxc3 12. bxc3 h6 13. Bh4 b5 14. c5 Nbd7 15. h3 Bh5 16. g4 Bg6 17. Bxg6 fxg6 18. g5 Ne4 19. gxh6 g5?! 20. h7+! Kh8 21. Bg3 Re6 22. Ne5 Nxe5 23. Bxe5 Rh6 24. Qg4 Qe7 25. Rfe1 Rh4 26. Qg2 Qd7 27. f3 Nf6 28. Qxg5 Qxh3 29. Bxf6 Qh1+ 30. Kf2 Qh2+ 31. Kf1 Qh3+ 32. Ke2 gxf6 33. Qxf6+ Kxh7 34. Qf7+ Kh8 35. Rg1 Qh2+ 36. Kd3 1-0 Repkova Eid,E-Kolcak,M/Slovakia 1995.
c) 9... Bxc3 10. bxc3 Ne4 11. Rc1 b6 12. Re1 c6 13. h3 Bh5 14. g4 Bg6 15. Ne5 Qh4 16. Qf3 Re6 17. cxd5 cxd5 18. c4 f5 19. cxd5 Re8 20. gxf5 Bh5 21. Qxe4 Qxh3 22. Bf1 1-0 Estrada Nieto,J-Csikos,M/Zalakaros 1997.
11... Bxh3? 12. gxh3 Qxh3 13. Ng5!
12. Bxc4 Bxc3 13. Rxc3 Bh5 14. Bb5 Nd5 15. Rc5 f6
15... Nxe3? 16. fxe3 Bxf3 17. Qxf3
|
17. Bc4! Nce7 18. Qxb7
Reb8 19. Qa6 Rxb2 20. Bb3 Kh8 21. Re1 Nxe3 22. Bxf7 Nc2 23. Qe6 Rd8 24. Rxc2 Rxc2 25. Qxe7 Qxe7 26. Rxe7 a5 27. g3 a4 28. Kg2 a3 29. Re3 Ra8 30. Bd5 c6 31. Bb3 Rb2 32. Rc3 h5 33. Ne1 Rd2 34. Nc2 h4 35. g4 Ra6 36. Nb4 Ra8 37. Nxc6 Kh7 38. d5 Kg6 39. Rf3 Re8 40. Na5 Re1 41. Nc4 Rxd5 42. Nxa3
1-0
Game Eleven
Johannes Hermann Zukertort - Samuel Rosenthal [A28]
London m/London (19) 1880
I always like to consider classic games with the openings that interest me. The following game reaches the French Exchange with c4 by transposition from the English Opening.
1. c4 e5 2. e3 Nf6 3. Nc3 Nc6 4. Nf3 Bb4
This is generally a good line for Black except that White transposes to a reversed Two Knights French with his next move which is easier for the French side.
5. d4!? exd4 6. exd4 d5 7. a3 Bxc3+ 8. bxc3
This is certainly too slow and hardly necessary.
9. Bd3! leads to lines considered above.
9... Re8+
9... Ne4! 10. Qc2 Bf5! appears to favor Black.
10. Be3 Ne7 11. Bd3 Nf5 12. Ne5!? dxc4
12... Be6!?
13. Bxc4 Nd6 14. Bb3 Be6 15.
|
20. Nf3! Qf6 21. Rfc1 Ne2+ 22. Qxe2 Bxh3 23. Qd2! h6 24. Qc3! Qf4?
24... Qxc3 25. Rxc3 Bg4 26. c5
25. gxh3 Re6 26. Re1 Rg6+ 27. Kf1 Rf6 28. Re3 Qf5 29. Ke2 Qxh3 30. Rg1 Kh8 31. Bc2 Rd8 32. Qe5 Qd7 33. Rd1 Rd6 34. Rxd6 cxd6 35. Qe7 g6 36. Qf6+ Kg8 37. Re7
1-0
Game Twelve
Alexander Alekhine - Slosar [D08]
Olomouc sim/Olomouc 1943
1. d4 d5 2. c4 e5 3. e3 exd4 4. exd4 Bb4+ 5. Nc3 Qe7+ 6. Be3
As usual, White needs to be prepared to sacrifice a pawn at e3 if necessary to speed his development. Miezes has done surprisingly well with the alternative.
6. Be2!? Bg4 (6... dxc4 7. Nf3 Nf6 8.
1-0 Miezis,N-Lagumina,G/Castellaneta 1998 (42))
7. Kf1!? Bxe2+ 8. Ngxe2 dxc4 9. Qa4+ c6 10. Nd5 b5 11. Nxe7 bxa4 12. Nf5 g6 13. Ne3 Nd7 14. Nxc4 Nb6 15. Ne5
0-1 Miezis,N-Barsov,A/Haarlem 1998 (50).
6... Be6 7. Qb3 dxc4 8. Bxc4 Bxc4 9. Qxc4 Nf6 10. Nf3 Ng4
|
11.
13... Qxe3+? 14. Kh1
is far too dangerous.
14. Rae1 c6 15. e4
Nd7 16. e5! Rae8 17. a4
17. Qd3 followed by Qf5 and Ng5 is a strong idea.
17... Nb6 18. Qb3 Qe6 19. Rb1!? Qxb3 20. Rxb3 Nxa4 21. Rxb7 Nxc3 22. Rxa7 Rd8
22... f6
23. Re1 Nb5 24. Ra4 Rd5?! 25. Rc1 Nc7
26. Rxc6 Ne6 27. Kf2 Rfd8 28. Ke3 Kf8 29. Rca6 Ke7 30. Ra7+ R8d7 31. Ke4 Rxa7 32. Rxa7+ Rd7 33. Rxd7+ Kxd7
34. d5 Nd8 35. Nd4 g6 36. g4 h6 37. h4 Nb7 38. Nb3 Ke7 39. h5 gxh5 40. gxh5 Kd7 41. Kf5 Ke7 42. d6+ Kf8 43. Kf6 Nd8 44. Nd4 Nb7 45. d7 Nd8 46. e6
Brilliant play by Alekhine to bring home the full point.
1-0Game Thirteen
Joshua Waitzkin - Tal Shaked [C01]
Mermaid Beach Club, Bermuda/Bermuda (7) 1997
I decided to throw in a "baker's dozen," even if it's a bit of a data dump, just for the sake of "coverage." This is what many consider the main line of the Monte Carlo currently. Personally, I prefer 7.a3 gaining the two Bishops and supporting White's d-pawn -- even if he may need to sac a pawn later. This main line, though, is full of piece play and lots of fight for players below 2000 ELO.
1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. exd5 exd5 4. c4 Bb4+
4... c6 5. Nc3 (5. Nf3 Nf6 6. Nc3 Bb4 7. Bd3 Bg4 8.
4... dxc4 5. Bxc4 Bb4+ (5... Bd6 6. Nf3 Nf6 7.
5... Nf6 6. Bd3
6... c6 7. Bd3
6... Bg4 7. h3 Bxf3 8. Qxf3 Nbc6 9. Be3
7... c5 8.
Only with this precise move order does Black equalize.
8... Nd5 9.
9. Be3
9. h3?! Bxf3 10. Qxf3 Qxd4 11. Qxb7? Bxc3+
10... Rb8!? 11. a3 Bxc3 12. bxc3 Nd5 13. Bd2 Na5 14. Ba2 b5
Watson
Pedersen notes that he finds it "hard to believe that White should have any advantage whatsoever" in this position, "but Miezis happily aims for it almost any time he has a chance. "
b) 11... Qd7 12. Ng5 Bh5 (12... Ncxd4 13. h3) (12... Na5 13. h3 (13. Bb5 c6 14. Ba4 Bh5 15. a3 (15. Ne2 Bg6 16. Nf4 b5 17. Nxg6 hxg6 18. Bc2 Rad8 19. a4 a6 20. axb5 axb5 21. Nf3 Nc4 22. Bb3 Ncxe3 23. fxe3 Qe7 24. Rf2 Qxe3 25. Qxe3 Nxe3 26. Ne5 Rxd4 27. Nxc6 Rd3 28. Bxf7+ Rxf7 29. Rxf7 Bc5 30. Ra8+ Kh7 31. Kf2 Rd6 32. b4 Nd1+ 33. Kg3 Bf2+ 34. Rxf2 Nxf2 35. Ne5 Nd3 36. Nf7 1-0 Miezis,N-Rodgaard,J/Gausdal 2003 (36)) 15... Be7 16. b4 Nc4 17. Qxc4 Nxe3 18. fxe3 Bxg5 19. Qd3 Rfe8 20. Rae1 Rad8 21. d5 Re5 22. e4 Qe7 23. Bb3 Kh8 24. Rf2 f5 25. Ref1 fxe4 26. Nxe4 Bh4 27. g3 Bg6 28. d6 Qe8 29. Bf7 Bxf7 30. Rxf7 h6 31. gxh4 1-0 Miezis,N-Friedrich,N/Porto San Giorgio 2002 (31)) 13... Bh5 14. Bd5 h6 15. Bf3 Bg6 16. Nge4 Nh4 17. Qd1 Nc4 18. Nd5 Nxf3+ 19. Qxf3 Bxe4 20. Qxe4 Rfe8 21. Qf3 Nd2 22. Bxd2 Bxd2 23. Rad1 Bg5 24. Nc3 c6 25. Ne4 Qd5 26. Nxg5 hxg5 27. Qxd5 cxd5 28. Rd2 Rac8 29. f3 f6 30. Kf2 Kf7 31. Rh1 Rc6 32. h4 gxh4 33. Rxh4 Rec8 34. Ke3 Rc2 35. Rh5 Rxd2 36. Kxd2 Ke6 37. Rh7 Kf7 38. b3 Kg6 39. Rh1 Kf5 40. Re1 Rc7 41. g3 g5 42. Re8 b6 43. Rh8 Ke6 44. a4 Kd6 45. g4 Ke6 46. Rh6 Re7 47. Kc3 Rc7+ 48. Kd3 Rg7 49. Ke3 Rc7 50. f4 gxf4+ 51. Kxf4 Rc1 52. g5 Rf1+ 53. Ke3 Rf5 54. gxf6 Rxf6 55. Rh7 Rf7 56. Rh8 Kd6 57. b4 Re7+ 58. Kd3 Rg7 59. Rd8+ Ke6 60. Re8+ Kd6 61. Rd8+ Ke6 62. Ra8 Rg3+ 63. Ke2 Rb3 64. b5 Rb4 65. Rxa7 Rxd4 66. Ke3 Re4+ 67. Kd3 Kd6 68. Kc3 Re3+ 69. Kd4 Re4+ 70. Kc3 Re3+ 71. Kd4 Re4+ Miezis,N-Dittmar,P/Seefeld 2000 (71)) 13. Nd5 Bg6 14. Nf4 Na5 15. Bd5 Nxe3 16. Nxg6 hxg6 17. Be6! Qe7 (17... fxe6? 18. Qxg6) 18. Qxg6 Qxg5 19. Qxg5 Nxf1 20. Bd7 Bd2 21. Qf5 Ne3 22. fxe3 Bxe3+ 23. Kh1 Nc4 24. Ba4 Rad8 25. d5 Bb6 26. Qh3 Ne5 Miezis,N-Dgebuadze,A/Bogny sur Meuse 2005 (26).
12. Bd5
12. Bg5 Qc8 13. Bd5 Qf5 14. Qxf5 Bxf5 15. Rfe1 Rfe8 16. Re3 Rxe3 17. fxe3 Re8 18. Bf4 Ne7 19. Bb3 h6 20. Ne5 g5 21. Bg3 Kg7= 0-1 Miezis,N-Luther,T/Dresden 1992 (58).
12... Bf5
12... Ne7 13. Bg5 h6 14. Bxe7 Qxe7 15. Rfe1 Qf6 16. Ne5 Bf5 17. Qf3 c6 18. Bb3 Rae8
(18... Rad8 19. Re3 Ba5 (19... Rfe8 20. Rae1 Be6 21. Qxf6 gxf6 22. Nd3 Ba5 23. Nc5 Bc8 24. N5e4 Nxe4 25. Rxe4 Rxe4 26. Rxe4 Kf8 27. h3 f5 28. Rh4 Kg7 29. d5 Bxc3 30. bxc3 cxd5 31. Rd4 Kf6 32. f4 b5 33. Rxd5 Rxd5 34. Bxd5 Be6 35. Bc6 Bxa2 36. Bxb5 Ke7 37. Kf2 Kd6 38. Ke3 Kc5 39. Bd7 Bb1 40. Be8 Ba2 41. Bd7 Bd5 Miezis,N-Pedersen,S/Gausdal 2000 (41)) 20. Rd1 Rfe8 21. Qe2 Re7 22. h3 Rde8 23. Re1 Be6?
|
24. Nxf7! Kxf7 25. Qh5+ g6 26. Bxe6+ Rxe6 27. Qxa5 Rxe3 28. fxe3 Kg7 29. Qxa7 Rf8 30. Nd1 Ne4 31. Qxb7+ Rf7 32. Qb8 Kh7 33. Qe5 Qh4 34. Rf1 Re7 35. Qf4 Qh5 36. Qf8 Rg7 37. Nf2 Qd5 38. Nxe4 Qxe4 39. Qf3 Qc2 40. Qf2 Qc4 41. b3 Qc3 42. Qe1 Qd3 43. Rf3 1-0 Miezis,N-Stark,L/Duesseldorf 2004 (43))
19. Re3 Re7 20. h3 Rfe8 21. Rae1 Kf8 22. Qh5 Qg5 23. Qe2 Be6 24. h4 Qf6 25. Bxe6 Qxe6 26. Ng6+ Qxg6 27. Rxe7 Rd8 28. a3 Ba5 29. Qe5 Bb6 30. Na4 f6 31. Qf4 Nf5 32. h5 Qg5 33. Qxg5 hxg5 34. Rxb7 Bxd4 35. g4 Nd6 36. Rc7 Be5 37. Nc5 Kg8 38. Ne6 Rb8 39. b4 Nf7 40. Rxa7 Re8 41. Nc5 Nh6 42. f3 Nf7 43. Kf1 Rd8 44. Rd7 Ra8 45. Re3 Rb8 46. Ke2 Ra8 47. Kd1 Re8 48. Kc2 Rb8 49. Red3 Re8 50. Kb3 Bf4 51. Ne4 Kf8 52. h6 gxh6 53. Nxf6 Re1 54. Ra7 Nd6 55. Ne4 Ne8 56. Rdd7 Re3+ 57. Kc2 Rxf3 58. Rh7 Kg8 59. Rxh6 Be3 60. Re7 Kf8 61. Rd7 Kg8 62. Rxc6 1-0 Miezis,N-Munoz,L/Turin 2006 (62).
13. Qd1
13. Qe2?! Na5 14. Bg5 Qc8 15. Rfc1 Re8 16. Qf1 c6 17. a3 Bxc3 18. Rxc3 Be6 19. Bxe6 Qxe6 20. b4 Nac4 21. Re1 Qd5 22. Be7! f6 23. Bxd6 Nxd6 24. Rc5 Qb3 25. Ra1 Re7 26. d5 Ne4 27. Re1 Rae8 28. Rxe4 Rxe4 29. Nd2 Qxa3 30. Nxe4 Rxe4 31. dxc6 bxc6 32. Rxc6 Qxb4
Ashley,M-Remlinger,L/New York 1994 (61).
13... Ne7
a) 13... Bxc3 14. bxc3 Ne4 15. Bxc6 bxc6 16. Qc1 Qd5 17. c4 Qa5 18. Ne5 Qa6 19. f3 Nd6 (19... Nf6 20. Rd1 Nd7 21. Bf4 Nxe5 22. Bxe5 Rac8 23. Qc3 f6 24. Bg3 Be6 25. Rac1 Bf7 26. Rd2 Rfe8 27. h4 Re7 28. Kh2 Rb8 29. d5 cxd5 30. cxd5 Rd8 31. Rcd1 Rdd7 32. Qb4 Re8 33. Qc5 Qb6 34. Qc3 Qb7 35. Rb2 Qa8 36. Bxc7 Rxd5 37. Rdb1 Rd7 38. Rb8 Qd5 39. Qe1 Kf8 40. Qb4+ Kg8 41. Re1 Qh5 42. g4 Qxh4+ 43. Kg2 Rxc7 44. Rexe8+ Bxe8 45. Rxe8+ Kf7 46. Rf8+ 1-0 Miezis,N-Sjodahl,P/Germany 1995 (46)) 20. d5 cxd5 21. cxd5 Rfe8 22. Bf4 f6 23. Nc6 Qb6+ 24. Kh1 Qb5 25. Rd1 Qa4 26. Nd4 Qd7 27. Qc6 Qxc6 28. dxc6 Bg6 29. Bxd6 cxd6 30. Nb5 Rec8 31. Rxd6 Be8 32. Nd4 Rab8 33. h3 Rb6 34. Rc1 Kf7 35. Kh2 g6 36. a4 a5 37. Rc5 Ra6 38. f4 Ke7 39. Re6+ Kf7 40. f5 gxf5 41. Rxf5 Kg7 42. Rfxf6 1-0 Miezis,N-Gurevich,M/Bonn 1995 (42)
b) 13... Na5 14. Bg5 Qc8 15. Qa4 Bxc3 16. bxc3 Nc6 17. Ne5 Ne4 18. Nxc6 bxc6 19. Bxe4 Bxe4 20. f3 Bd3 21. Rfe1 f6 22. Bf4 Qd7 23. Re3 Bg6 24. Qa5 Bf7 25. Re2 Bc4 26. Rb2 Rfc8 27. h4 a6 28. Rab1 Qf7 29. Kh2 Bd5 30. Bg3 Qh5 31. Qc5 Qf7 32. a4 Re8 33. Rc1 Rab8 34. Rd2 Qd7 35. c4 Bf7 36. Qa5 Rec8 37. d5 Ra8 38. Re1 cxd5 39. cxd5 c5 40. d6 Re8 41. Qc7 Red8 42. Re7 Qxc7 43. Rxc7 c4 44. Re2 h5 45. Ree7 Rf8 46. Bf4 a5 47. Kg3 Rad8 48. d7 Bg6 49. Bd6 Bf5 50. Kf4 Bxd7 51. Rexd7 Rxd7 52. Rxd7 Re8 53. Rc7 Rd8 54. Be7 Rd2 55. g3 c3 56. Kf5 Kh7 57. Bxf6 c2 58. Rxg7+ Kh6 59. Bg5+ 1-0 Miezis,N-Glek,I/Hamburg 1995 (59).
15. a3!? Ba5 (15... Bxc3 16. bxc3 Nd5 17. Bd2 b5?! 18. Ne5)
16. Ne5 Ng6 17. Qh5 Qb6 18. Bxf7+ Nxf7 19. Nc4 Qa6 20. Nxa5 Qxa5 21. b4 (21. g4?! Nd6 22. gxf5 Rxf5
)
21... Qc7 22. Qxf5
.
a) 16. Re1 f6 17. Nd3 Bxc3 18. bxc3 Nd5 19. c4 Nxe3 20. Rxe3 Re8= Pedersen 21. Nf4 Rxe3 22. fxe3 Qe7 23. Qf3 Re8 24. Re1 Be4 25. Qd1 b6
0-1 Miezis,N-Moreno Ruiz,J/Andorra 2001 (65)
b) 16. Ne2 with the idea of Ng3 is a suggestion of Pedersen's.
16... f6 17. Nd3 Bxc3 18. bxc3 Nd5 19. Nf4
19. Bf4!? Bxd3?! (19... Ne4 20. Bxd5=)
20. Bxd6 Bxf1 21. Bxf8 Bxg2 22. Bxg7+ Kxg7 23. Kxg2
Watson and Pedersen see this as clearly better for Black thanks to his blockade on the light squares and the backward White e-pawn. However, I think White can easily hold this position and develop counterplay with an eventual c4 push.
22. c4=
22... Ne4 23. c4 a6 24. cxb5 axb5 25. Rc1 Rc8 26. a4 bxa4 27. Bxa4 Bd7 28. Nd3 Ra8 29. Bc2 Be6 30. Nf2 Bd5 31. Nxe4 Bxe4 32. Bxe4 Qxe4 33. Qf3 Rfe8 34. Qxe4 Rxe4 35. Kf2 Rae8 36. Rfe1 R8e6 37. Rc3 g6 38. Ra1 f5 39. g3 g5 40. Kf3 Kg7 41. Ra7+ Kg6 42. Ra6 Kf6
1/2-1/2
Monte Carlo Variation Bibliography
Baburin, Alexander. "Play on the e-file." Winning Pawn Structures (Batsford 2003): 92-101. In his contemporary classic on the isolani pawn structure, GM Baburin devotes a chapter mostly to positions where the e-file is unobstructed by pawns. This position can arise from many openings, but especially the Queen's Gambit Accepted (1.d4 d5 2.c4 dxc4 3.e3 e5 4.Bxc4 exd4 5.exd4) or the French Exchange Variation (1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.exd5 exd5 4.c4 dxc4 5.Bxc4). Baburin notes that "pressure along the e-file is particularly unpleasant for Black where it is combined with pressure along the a2-g8 diagonal." An excellent book and a very useful chapter.
Burgess, Graham. 101 Chess Opening Surprises (Gambit 2001): 62. Offers a brief repertoire with the line 4.c4 Bb4+ 5.Nc3 Ne7, focused around the games of Tal Shaked and biased toward Black.
Glek, Igor. "French Defence, Exchange Variation." New in Chess Yearbook 20 (1991): 39-41. A balanced treatment of the line with an early White c4, focused on the game Klinger - Glek, Werfen Open 1990, which began 4.Nf3 Nf6 5.c4 Bb4+ 6.Nc3 O-O 7.Be2 Ne4?! 8.Qb3! += and was eventually won by White.
Lane, Gary. "A French Farce." Opening Lanes 46 at ChessCafe. http://www.chesscafe.com/text/lane46.pdf
Lane, Peter. "Exeter Chess Club: The Queen's Gambit Accepted/Isolated Queen's Pawn." Exeter Chess Club 1998. http://www.exeterchessclub.org.uk/Openings/qga_iqp.html
Mednis, Edmar. "The Not-so-harmless Exchange Variation of the French Defence." Practical Opening Tips (Cardogan / Everyman 1997): 110-117. Mednis's book is an excellent treatment of themes in the opening, but this chapter also offers a rather thorough and positive treatment of lines following both 4.c4 Nf6 5.Nc3 c6 (which can also arise via the Slav move order 1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nc3 e5 4.e3 exd4 5.exd4 Nf6) and 4.Nf3, which can transpose.
Pedersen, Steffen. French Advance and Other Lines (Gambit 2005): 104-106. Focuses on the line 1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.exd5 exd5 4.c4 Bb4+ 5.Nc3 Ne7 6.Nf3 Bg4 as illustrated by the games of Miezis as White and Shaked as Black. Pedersen's main line goes 7.Be2 dxc4 8.Bxc4 O-O 9.Be3 Nbc6 10.O-O Nf5 11.Qd3 Nd6 12.Bd5 which has occured in numerous high level games (including at least one of the author's own).
Razuvaev, Yuri. "You were right, Monsieur La Bourdonnais!" Secrets of Opening Preparation. Ed. Mark Dvoretsky and Artur Yusupov. (Olms 2007): 170-180.
A wonderful article that reinforces my favorite theme in these pages: that there is still a lot of opening knowledge to gain from the great players of even the most distant past. Razuvaev considers the line 1.d4 d5 2.c4 dxc4 3.e3 e5!? as contested in the classic LaBourdonnais - McDonnell match -- a line that typically transposes to the Monte Carlo Variation after 4.Bxc4 exd4 5.exd4. Thanks to reader Jose for pointing me to this article, which I had initially overlooked.
Van der Sterren, Paul. "Transposition from the Queens Gambit." New in Chess Yearbook 32 (1994). Considers the line 1.d4 d5 2.c4 dxc4 3.e3 e5 4. Bxc4 (Queens Gambit Accepted or Monte Carlo French) 4...exd4 5.exd4 Nf6 6.Nf3 Be7 7.0-0 0-0 8. h3 Nc6, which is now a Petroff, as in Gelfand - Adams Wijk aan Zee 1994. Thanks to reader Jose for this information.
Watson, John. Play the French, 3rd Edition (Everyman Chess 2003): 71-73. Focuses on the games of Watson's former student Tal Shaked with the line 4....Bb4+ 5.Nc3 Ne7 -- as he notes, "A move this book helped to bring to attention."
Copyright © 2009 by Michael Goeller