Kenilworth Kibitzer

A blog for members of the Kenilworth Chess Club.

Friday, November 13, 2009


In Anticipation

On December 3rd, future International Master Yaacov Norowitz is going to give us a lecture on playing on colored square complexes.  Simply put, in a given position the combination of pawn structure and pieces on the board may give one side powerful control over connected squares of the same color.  That side can then try to convert their control of these squares into a positional bind, a mating attack or even a carefully constructed defense in an otherwise hopeless situation.  This can be seen very easily in positions where a fianchettoed bishop (say on g7) is eliminated, leaving the adjacent squares f6 and h6 without pawn or piece cover and open to invasion by enemy pieces.  Sound simple?  Perhaps, but this is a legitimately difficult concept to execute, and mastery of it is the mark of a high class player.   With any luck, Yaacov can shed some light for us.  In the meantime, we'll take a look at Karpov-Shirov (Biel, 1992) which is annotated very nicely by Kasparov amongst others.  In this game Karpov creates a well calculated light-square domination theme almost out of the ether.   We'll pick up the game on move 17 of a Meran Semi-Slav, where Black seems close to playing ...c5, unleashing his light-squared bishop and ensuring at least equality.

17. Ng5!  (heading for e4, preventing ...c5)  Qe7
18. Nce4  Nxe4
19. Nxe4  Bb4
20. Ng3!  (The threat now is Nf5 and then f4, when g7 falls)  f6

Black had the choice of defending the g7 square either this way or with 20...g6.   I won't borrow from the detailed analysis on how White can best proceed against 20....g6, but it suffices to point out that ...g6 uncomfortably weakens the dark squares around the Black king and opens the a1-h8 diagonal further for White's bishop.  This being the case, it seems very natural to play ...f6 as it seems to offer less of a target, and the dark squares are protected.   But Karpov sees farther...

21. Bxe5!   Qxe5    White has removed the sole protector of the light squares on Black's kingside since Black's bishop is still trapped on b7 (notice whether that bishop plays any role in this game)
22. Bd3   h6     (...g6 would have been hard to decide on because of the many possibilities for White after 23. Bxg6  hxg6  24. Qxg6+)
Now we can see that the light squares around the Black king are vulnerable, but this one weakness is not yet enough to press for a win, so Karpov positions his pieces on dominant squares then expands the field of battle.

23. Bg6  Rf8
24. Nf5  c5

25. axb5   axb5
26. Ra7    Qc6
27.  Nh4  Rxd1+
28. Qxd1  Ra8       (threatening to take another pair of major pieces off the board when it seems like Black might hold)
29. Qg4!!  Qc6    (29...Rxa7??  30. Qe6+  Mate in two)
30. Rxb7!  Qxb7
31. Qe6+   Kh8
32. Be4     Resigns

When 32....Ra1+  33. Kh2  Qb8+ 34. f4 is not going to stop White from mating using the Q-B-N combination on the light squares.  Notice the absence of Black's pieces from the Kingside and the iron grip that White has on f5, g6, and even f7.  White's pieces can move interchangeably on the light squares and create new problems at will for Black.   About this game Kasparov noted ' this game did not make a single bad move (but a whole series of second-rate ones)'.  For all of us who make nothing but second-rate moves, this makes for a powerful demonstration.

The ability to conceptualize the transition from the top position (seemingly equal) to the bottom one (utterly winning) is what Yaacov will now teach us, in one easy lesson!

Note that Yaacov's lecture got moved to the tenth!! Be there or be square!

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home


February 2009   March 2009   April 2009   May 2009   June 2009   July 2009   August 2009   September 2009   October 2009   November 2009   December 2009  

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Subscribe to Posts [Atom]